sogeisetsu · Daily GitHub activitysogeisetsu 的 GitHub 每日动态
@sogeisetsu·2026-10-07 00:00 – 24:00 · UTC+8
On 2026-10-07, 8 own commits landed across two repos, plus 9 automated commits by github-actions[bot] in sogeisetsu/sogeisetsu.
In sogeisetsu/meld-deepresearch, 5 commits shipped v0.4.0: a new meld.py thin CLI that wraps all six gate scripts behind one --outdir, a lighter skill with --fix support and two downgraded gate codes, README restructuring to the Standard Readme spec, and numbered gates in the flow diagrams.
In sogeisetsu/sogeisetsu, 3 commits added a manual daily-report Action trigger step to the release flow, a new AGENTS.md rule requiring code changes to go through branches, and Discussions collection/display (started, commented, and others' replies).
No pull requests or reviews were filed.
The user opened or commented on 3 issues: opened alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim #1475 about reflect --sessions querying legacy V1 tables and returning 0 sessions on OpenCode V2, then commented on it; and commented on anomalyco/opencode #50878 about the model remaining usable after deleting ~/.local/share/opencode/auth.json.
The user also started discussion openchamber/openchamber #4502 on storing relay identity keys encrypted at rest, which drew 2 replies from btriapitsyn defending the current 0600-permission storage model.
2026-10-07 当天，8 次本人提交分布在两个仓库，另有 9 次由 github-actions[bot] 在 sogeisetsu/sogeisetsu 自动提交。
在 sogeisetsu/meld-deepresearch 中，5 次提交完成了 v0.4.0：新增 meld.py 轻量 CLI，将六个 gate 脚本统一封装在 --outdir 之下；skill 精简并新增 --fix 支持，两个 gate 代码降级；两个 README 按 Standard Readme 规范重构；流程图中的 gate 编号补齐。
在 sogeisetsu/sogeisetsu 中，3 次提交为发布流程增加了手动触发日报 Action 的步骤，在 AGENTS.md 中新增「代码修改必须走分支」约束，并新增 Discussions 采集与展示（发起、评论、他人回复）。
当天未提交任何 PR 或 review。
用户新开或评论了 3 个 issue：新开 alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim #1475，反映 reflect --sessions 查询旧版 V1 表导致 OpenCode V2 下返回 0 个 session，随后在该 issue 中评论；并评论了 anomalyco/opencode #50878，关于删除 ~/.local/share/opencode/auth.json 后模型仍可用且未从模型列表移除。
用户还发起了讨论 openchamber/openchamber #4502，讨论将 relay 身份密钥静态加密存储，btriapitsyn 回复了 2 条，为当前 0600 权限的存储方式辩护。
9 automated commits by @github-actions[bot] · not counted in the total9 次自动提交，由 @github-actions[bot] 发起 · 不计入总提交数
This release spans everything since v0.3.0, including the v0.3.1 patch (skill descriptions now carry the search terms people actually type). The headline changes make the skill smaller to read, safer to re-run, and harder to misuse.
meld.pyThe gates are still the same scripts, but you no longer need to remember their paths or flags. skills/meld-deepresearch/scripts/meld.py wraps all six of them behind one --outdir:
meld.py prepare merges the per-axis files and runs gate ① (it picks up .work/plan.json automatically on a normal run)meld.py render writes both report files plus citations.json in one shotmeld.py review [--clean] picks the right file for you — structural pass or delivery gatemeld.py verify runs the whole chain and stops at the first failure, naming the stage that failedEvery command stays independently runnable, and references/protocol.md §9 is now the single place that lists the gate commands (raw forms kept alongside as equivalents).
content_review.py --fix repairs the two mechanical mistakes it used to only report: a labelled counter-evidence callout (**最强反证：** / **Strongest counter-evidence:**) is unwrapped back into the paragraph it belongs to, and generic container headings (## Findings, ## 分析, …) are demote…
AI v0.4.0 spans everything since v0.3.0 (including the v0.3.1 patch that added real search terms to skill descriptions). The headline change is skills/meld-deepresearch/scripts/meld.py, a thin CLI that wraps all six gate scripts behind one --outdir with prepare, render, review [--clean], and other subcommands. The skill is also lighter to read, safer to re-run, and harder to misuse.v0.4.0 涵盖自 v0.3.0 以来的全部变更（含 v0.3.1 补丁，为 skill 描述补充真实搜索词）。核心变化是 skills/meld-deepresearch/scripts/meld.py，一个轻量 CLI，将六个 gate 脚本统一封装在 --outdir 之下，提供 prepare、render、review [--clean] 等子命令。skill 同时变得更易阅读、更安全地重跑、更难被误用。
Thanks for digging into this, the measurements are useful. I went through the full history of the repo, including the old Tauri desktop app, and no OpenChamber version has ever written settings.json.…
Thanks for the report. The file is only readable by your user (0600 on macOS/Linux, the user profile ACL on Windows), the same way ssh keys and OpenCode's auth.json are stored. OpenChamber doesn't cr…